In many fleets the digital checklist is already in place, but it works in passive mode: the driver flags faults and that information is recorded, but nobody does anything with it until someone reads it. Critical faults can go hours or days without action. When the checklist is integrated with the ticketing system, every flagged fault automatically creates a Corrective ticket with all the evidence attached, and the workflow starts without manual intervention.
This guide explains how the integration works, what the operation gains by turning it on, and which specific settings are recommended according to the severity of the fault.
Without integration with the ticketing system, the digital checklist creates three problems:
Detection without action. The driver reports a problem. The information stays in the system. Nobody reads it until the next review. Anywhere from 4 to 24 hours can go by.
Lost evidence. When someone finally creates the ticket manually, the photo, the time of the report or the original detail is often lost.
Execution without traceability. A manual ticket cannot be formally linked to the source checklist. If there is an audit or an accident later, traceability is incomplete.
With the integration active, all three problems go away: the ticket is created at the moment of the report, with the evidence and with a formal link to the checklist that originated it.
Not every fault needs the same treatment. Configuration is done by severity, item by item on the checklist.
Critical severity. Faults that compromise safety or make the vehicle inoperable: brakes, steering, mandatory lights, wheels. Rule: automatic ticket plus lock on the unit until the ticket is closed.
High severity. Faults that degrade operation but allow it to continue with caution: abnormal noises, secondary warning lights, filters. Rule: automatic ticket with a tight deadline. The vehicle can keep operating.
Medium or low severity. Minor faults: interior light, loose cover, cosmetic items. Rule: ticket with a relaxed deadline, or several grouped into a single ticket.
The lock for a critical fault is a logical mechanism, not a physical one. The system does not shut off the engine. It marks the vehicle as not operable, which triggers:
If the driver operates the locked vehicle, it is formally recorded as a breach of procedure. If there is an accident afterwards, the lock’s traceability is clear evidence.
The lock is lifted when the ticket is closed with evidence of resolution.
The typical mistakes that erode the usefulness of the integration:
Every fault configured as critical. This causes excessive locks. The vehicle gets locked over an interior light and the fleet stops trusting the system.
No lock on truly critical faults. The driver reports weak brakes, keeps operating, and there is an accident. Serious legal liability.
No clear categorization. All tickets reach the same workshop with the same deadline. Urgent ones get mixed in with minor ones.
No identified driver. The fault cannot be linked to whoever reported it, and over time report quality declines.
These mistakes are avoided with careful item-by-item configuration during implementation.
→ Explore the Inspections module
→ Book a VEC Fleet demo
Yes. Integrating separate systems adds latency and points of failure. Ideally everything lives on the same platform, which is what makes the link between the checklist and the ticket formal rather than a manual reference.
No. The lock is lifted only when the ticket is closed with evidence of resolution.
A supervisor with specific authorization can lift the lock temporarily, and that action is recorded. It is an exception for genuine operational emergencies, not a shortcut.
It is defined during initial implementation, item by item, and adjusted during the first few weeks. The most common mistake is starting out with too many faults marked as critical: that causes excessive locks and the fleet stops trusting the system.
Yes. In small fleets a single late ticket can have a big impact, because there is no spare unit to cover the one that is out of service.
Yes. Integrating separate systems adds latency and points of failure. Ideally everything lives on the same platform, which is what makes the link between the checklist and the ticket formal rather than a manual reference.
No. The lock is lifted only when the ticket is closed with evidence of resolution.
A supervisor with specific authorization can lift the lock temporarily, and that action is recorded. It is an exception for genuine operational emergencies, not a shortcut.
It is defined during initial implementation, item by item, and adjusted during the first few weeks. The most common mistake is starting out with too many faults marked as critical: that causes excessive locks and the fleet stops trusting the system.
Yes. In small fleets a single late ticket can have a big impact, because there is no spare unit to cover the one that is out of service.